Use the official contact details below, or create a simple draft message to copy into your own email or contact form. Where an official email address is available, you can also open the finished draft in your own email application. Verified vote and constituency records can add factual context to the same private drafting tool.
Private by design. This tool runs in your browser. Project Open Gov does not submit, store or send what you type here.
Using constituency context
Add your own name and any address or postcode information the MP's office asks for in your own email or contact service. Opening the draft in your email application uses a standard mailto link; Project Open Gov does not send or store the message.
Parliamentary career
This section uses the official Parliament Biography record to show current and previous parliamentary roles and memberships.
No current committee memberships recordedin Parliament's current Biography record
No previous parliamentary career records shownin the categories used on this page
Current
Representation
Birmingham Perry Barr
Elected 1 time · 4 July 2024 – Present
Parliamentary party affiliation
Independent
4 July 2024 – Present
Career data last collected 5 September 2026. Current committee details come from Parliament's Committees service; previous committee history comes from the Parliament Biography record. View the official Parliament career page ↗
Registered interests
This section reflects the interests currently published for this MP in the latest House of Commons Register of Members' Financial Interests. Project Open Gov does not apply its own date filter or remove entries that Parliament still publishes.
Latest register7 September 2026
Published parent interests11
Categories represented7
Published GBP values25
Rectified entries are present. Parliament's rectification marker is shown against the relevant official records below. Project Open Gov does not treat the number of marked records as a count of separate standards cases.
Published monetary values
The overview combines the explicit GBP values currently published by Parliament into one bubble for each type of monetary interest. Select a category to break that bubble into every published component. Circle area is proportional to value. The basic annual MP salary is shown only as a reference for scale.
Basic MP salaryEmployment / earningsSupport for MP activitiesGifts / hospitality
Rectified
£98,599Basic MP salary
The overview shows every monetary category for which Parliament publishes an explicit GBP value. Category bubbles are sums of the individual published values within that category; they are provided for visual comparison and are not described as personal income. Selecting a category shows every component used in that bubble. Small components carry their value where space permits. Every component can be selected to show its full value and description, and to jump to the exact register entry below.
View all published monetary entries used in this comparison
£40,000 — Support for MP activities · International Centre of Justice for Palestinians - £40,000.00
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 April 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 May 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 27 June 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 July 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 August 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 26 September 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 October 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 November 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 26 December 2025 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 January 2026 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 27 February 2026 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 27 March 2026 - £1,662.73
£1,662.73 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 April 2026 - £1,662.73
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 26 July 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 August 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 27 September 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 October 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 November 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 27 December 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 January 2025 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 February 2024 - £1,573.00
£1,573 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 March 2025 - £1,573.00
£888.49 — Employment / earnings · Payment received on 28 May 2026 - £888.49
£324.80 — Gifts / hospitality · Your Party UK Ltd - £324.80
Interests by category
Open a category to see the underlying records and any related payments or sub-entries published by Parliament.
Employment and earnings2
Councillor - Birmingham City Council
Registered 10 July 2024
Job Title
Councillor
Is Until Further Notice
No
Payer Name
Birmingham City Council
Payer Is Private Individual
No
Is Paid As Director Of Payer
No
Payer Public Address
Council House, Victoria Square, Birmingham B1 1BB
Related payments / entries
Payment received on 28 May 2026 - £888.49
Registered 23 June 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2026-05-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£888.49
Hours worked
40.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 28 April 2026 - £1,662.73
Registered 6 May 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2026-04-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
176.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 27 March 2026 - £1,662.73
Registered 27 March 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2026-03-27
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
168.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 27 February 2026 - £1,662.73
Registered 2 March 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2026-02-27
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 28 January 2026 - £1,662.73
Registered 28 January 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2026-01-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
176.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 26 December 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 5 January 2026 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-12-26
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 28 November 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 28 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-11-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 28 August 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-08-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
176.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 October 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-10-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 April 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-04-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 27 June 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-06-27
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
168.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 26 July 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-07-26
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 27 September 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-09-27
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
168.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 October 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-10-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Payment received on 28 May 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-05-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 July 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-07-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 November 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-11-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
168.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 January 2025 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-01-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
184.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 26 September 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-09-26
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
176.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 March 2025 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-03-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
168.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 27 December 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-12-27
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
176.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 August 2025 - £1,662.73
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2025-08-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,662.73
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Payment received on 28 February 2024 - £1,573.00
Registered 3 November 2025 · 1.1 Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments
Rectified
Payment Received
Yes
Received Date
2024-02-28
Payment Type
Monetary
Value
£1,573
Hours worked
160.00
Is Ultimate Payer Different
No
Ultimate Payer Protected By Confidentiality
No
Is Payment Donated
No
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Director & Employee, Barrister - Chambers of Ayoub Khan Ltd
Registered 10 July 2024
Job Title
Director & Employee, Barrister
Start Date
2024-07-04
Is Until Further Notice
No
Payer Name
Chambers of Ayoub Khan Ltd
Payer Is Private Individual
Yes
Is Paid As Director Of Payer
Yes
Payer Nature Of Business
Barrister
Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP1
International Centre of Justice for Palestinians - £40,000.00
Registered 26 January 2026
Donation Source
(b) Any other support not included in Category 2(a)
Payment Type
In kind
Payment Description
Full-time research assistant provided to the Independent Alliance MPs to support their work in Parliament
Hotel accommodation - 2 nights. Room shared with partner
Value
£324.80
Received Date
2025-11-28
Accepted Date
2025-11-28
Received End Date
2025-11-30
Is Sole Beneficiary
No
Donor Name
Your Party UK Ltd
Donor Public Address
The Atrium, 89-93 Fonthill Road, Finsbury Park, London N4 3JH
Donor Status
Registered Party
Visits outside the UK1
International visit to Qatar between 06 December 2024 and 09 December 2024
Registered 19 September 2025
Rectified
Country
Qatar
Destination
Doha
Purpose
To participate in the Doha Forum 2024
Start Date
2024-12-06
End Date
2024-12-09
Name
Doha Forum
Is Private Individual
No
Public Address
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Almirqab Tower, West Bay, Doha Qatar
Payment Type
In kind
Payment Description
Flights, accommodation and food
Value
£5,955
Is Sole Beneficiary
Yes
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Land and property (within or outside the UK)2
Property in Birmingham
Registered 10 July 2024
Is Sole Owner
No
Location
Birmingham
Property Description
Rented houses
Property Owner Details
Co-owned with a family member
Registrable Rental Income
Yes
Rental Income Details
Part of the rental income is paid to my partner
Number Of Properties
2
Is Land
No
Is Any Rental Income Paid To Another Person
Yes
Country
United Kingdom
Property Type
Residential
Property in Birmingham
Registered 10 July 2024
Is Sole Owner
No
Location
Birmingham
Property Description
Residential and commercial
Property Owner Details
Co-owned by me and my company
Registrable Rental Income
Yes
Rental Income Details
Part of the rental income is paid to the company
Number Of Properties
1
Is Land
No
Is Any Rental Income Paid To Another Person
Yes
Country
United Kingdom
Property Type
Other
Shareholdings2
Shares in AK International Enterprises Ltd
Registered 15 December 2025
Shareholding Threshold
(i) Shareholdings: over 15% of issued share capital
Registrable Date
2025-12-11
Organisation Name
AK International Enterprises Ltd
Organisation Description
Investment firm
Shares in Chambers of Ayoub Khan Limited
Registered 10 July 2024
Shareholding Threshold
(i) Shareholdings: over 15% of issued share capital
Organisation Name
Chambers of Ayoub Khan Limited
Organisation Description
Barrister
Miscellaneous2
Unpaid Director of Your Party UK Ltd, a private company limited by guarantee without share capital which was incorporated on 31 July 2025, and dissolved via voluntary strike-off on 21 April 2026.
Registered 15 September 2025
Rectified
Arose On
2025-07-31
End Date
2026-04-21
Description
Unpaid Director of Your Party UK Ltd, a private company limited by guarantee without share capital which was incorporated on 31 July 2025, and dissolved via voluntary strike-off on 21 April 2026.
Miscellaneous Interest Type
Unpaid role
Rectified
Parliament marks this entry as rectified.
This is a late entry to which the rectification procedure was applied on 17 February 2026. Paragraph 51 of the Procedural Protocol in respect of the Code of Conduct refers.
Member of the Bar Council. This is an unpaid role.
Registered 10 July 2024
Description
Member of the Bar Council. This is an unpaid role.
Miscellaneous Interest Type
Unpaid role
How to read this section
The chart first groups explicit monetary values by type so different kinds of registered interest remain visually distinct. Select a category bubble to see every individual published value behind it. Project Open Gov does not combine all categories into one grand total or describe support, gifts or visit values as personal income. The salary reference is the basic annual MP salary of £98,599 from 1 April 2026 and is not itself a registered interest.
Project Open Gov voting coverage begins with the 2026–27 parliamentary session, which began on 13 May 2026. The earliest Commons division currently available is 19 May 2026, with records currently running to 9 September 2026. Earlier parliamentary sessions are not included; future sessions will be retained within this same record.
About “No recorded vote”. This means the official Commons division record does not show the MP as voting Aye or No, or acting as a teller. It does not by itself explain why there is no recorded vote.
Recent divisions
Draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
9 September 2026 · Division 72
Voted Aye
Statutory instrument voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on whether to approve the draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026.
View full voting record (71 divisions in coverage)
71 divisions shown
2026
September 2026 — 12 divisions
Draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
9 September 2026 · Division 72
Voted Aye
Statutory instrument voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on whether to approve the draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026.
Amendment 199 — security and intelligence disclosures
14 July 2026 · Division 57
Voted No
Bill stage voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether the duty of candour could require certain security or intelligence information to be provided only with consent from the head of the relevant service or agency, subject to specified conditions.
MPs voted on whether public authorities or officials assisting an inquiry, investigation or inquest should have to demonstrate that relevant people can safely disclose information.
MPs voted on the Opposition’s reasoned amendment to decline the Immigration and Asylum Bill a Second Reading, arguing that the Bill did not go far enough on illegal immigration, deportations, asylum, settlement and human-rights constraints.
Draft Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026
8 July 2026 · Division 52
No recorded vote
Statutory instrument voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on whether to approve the draft Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
Draft Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (Establishment of Schools) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (Establishment of Schools) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026
8 July 2026 · Division 51
No recorded vote
Statutory instrument voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on whether to approve the draft Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (Establishment of Schools) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on an Opposition Day motion about the early release of prisoners, including concerns about whether people convicted of serious sexual offences would be released.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 5 to require a Treasury review of the temporary goods vehicle VED (road freight tax) rates and reporting to Parliament.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
New Clause 4 — Electricity Generator Levy rate review
1 July 2026 · Division 47
No recorded vote
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 4, which would require the Treasury to review the impact of increasing the Electricity Generator Levy rate to 55% and report to Parliament by 31 March 2028.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 2 to the Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill, which would require a review of the approved mileage allowance rate paid to care workers who use a personal vehicle for work.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2026
1 July 2026 · Division 44
No recorded vote
Statutory instrument voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on whether to approve the draft Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2026.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
New Clause 4 — settlement fee waiver for service families
22 June 2026 · Division 33
Voted Aye
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to waive indefinite-leave-to-remain fees for spouses or children of serving or former armed forces members who had served for four or more years.
MPs voted on whether the Bill should include New Clause 3, which would require the Secretary of State to bring forward regulations to designate the IRGC as involved in foreign power threat activity within a month.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on a proposal (Amendment 13) to create new offences for conduct that is self-directed and prepared in relation to a designated body under the Bill.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to amend the Bill so that, after a body is designated, the Secretary of State must review whether further action should be taken against the body and connected persons and then report the outcome to Parliament.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
Allocation of Time — timetable for further consideration
17 June 2026 · Division 28
No recorded vote
Procedural voteMotion agreed
MPs voted on an Allocation of Time motion for the National Security (State Threats) Bill, setting the timetable for its further consideration in the House.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages
New Clause 14 — register of foreign powers
16 June 2026 · Division 25
Voted Aye
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether the Government should establish and maintain a register of foreign powers that the Secretary of State believes present a cyber-security risk to the UK, to inform the use of Part 4 powers.
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages
New Clause 13 — Digital Sovereignty Strategy
16 June 2026 · Division 24
Voted Aye
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 13, which would require the Government to publish a “Digital Sovereignty Strategy” to assess and mitigate risks to security and resilience from foreign interference and reliance on foreign-supplied technologies and to build domestic capacity.
MPs voted on whether to require Great British Railways to continue offering discounted rail fares for UK veterans, armed forces personnel and their families, and for young people aged 26 to 30 under Amendment 143.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to insert New Clause 1, which would require a “Passengers' Charter” to set standards and improvement plans for rail passenger experience.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
New Clause 4 — compensation and financial assistance cap
9 June 2026 · Division 17
Official record conflict
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 4 to the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill, which would cap total compensation and financial assistance payable under the Act unless authorised by a Commons resolution.
Source discrepancy. Parliament's published division data places this MP in more than one voting-state list (Voted Aye and Voted No). Project Open Gov therefore does not assign a voting side for this division.
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 12, which would cap the amount of financial assistance available under the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Act.
MPs voted on whether to require the Secretary of State to make a statement to Parliament about the value of contingent liabilities before using the Bill's main powers to transfer (nationalise) steel undertakings.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 2, which would require the Secretary of State to set up a stakeholder advisory committee and consult it before key public-interest decisions under the Bill.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
New Clause 13 — single living accommodation standards
2 June 2026 · Division 10
No recorded vote
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to add New Clause 13 to the Armed Forces Bill, which would amend the Renters' Rights Act 2025 to set defence housing standards for single living accommodation.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
New Clause 6 — ECHR derogation for overseas operations
2 June 2026 · Division 9
No recorded vote
New Clause voteMotion negatived
MPs voted on whether to require the Secretary of State to consider whether to make an ECHR derogation for significant overseas operations under the Human Rights Act 1998.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on whether to include New Clause 5, which would waive fees for applications for indefinite leave to remain by spouses and dependants of serving or discharged armed forces personnel.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on a new clause that would require the Secretary of State to lay a Defence Investment Plan before both Houses of Parliament within one month of the Act being passed.
The official division record does not show a recorded vote for this MP. It does not state the reason.
MPs voted on the House agreeing an Address to the King in response to the Gracious Speech.
Source discrepancy. Parliament's published division data places this MP in more than one voting-state list (Voted Aye and Voted No). Project Open Gov therefore does not assign a voting side for this division.
MPs voted on an amendment to the Opposition's motion for an Address in response to the King's Speech, regretting the absence of a Defence Readiness Bill and related defence planning commitments.
Source discrepancy. Parliament's published division data places this MP in more than one voting-state list (Voted Aye and Voted No). Project Open Gov therefore does not assign a voting side for this division.
MPs voted on an amendment to the King's Speech Address debate to express regret that the Gracious Speech did not include a Defence Readiness Bill and to call for specific defence policy actions.
MPs voted on an amendment to the motion for an Address to the King that would have expressed regret at the lack of a Defence Readiness Bill and other defence-related delays, and urged the Government to bring forward relevant measures and raise defence spending.
Source discrepancy. Parliament's published division data places this MP in more than one voting-state list (Voted Aye and Voted No). Project Open Gov therefore does not assign a voting side for this division.
Individual voting states are verified against the official Commons Votes division data. Project Open Gov adds the explanatory text, vote type and link to the corresponding Project Open Gov vote page.
Spoken contributions
Recent debates and proceedings in which Parliament records this MP as contributing. Project Open Gov shows the official contribution summary by debate, rather than listing every individual speech or intervention.
Coverage on this profile begins with the 2026–27 session (13 May 2026).
Rewiring the State
2 September 2026 · House of Commons · Commons Chamber
Recent written questions tabled by this MP. Answers are kept behind an expander so the profile stays compact.
Coverage on this profile begins with the 2026–27 session (13 May 2026).
Defence: Finance
Tabled 30 June 2026 · Department for Energy Security and Net Zero · UIN 14746
Answered
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will publish a list of capital projects that have been (a) cancelled, (b) delayed, (c) descoped and (d) reprofiled to fund the Defence Investment Plan, broken down by region and with th
View answer · 6 July 2026
Answered by: Michael Shanks
The savings are a small part of DESNZ’s overall budget, which saw a significant uplift at Spending Review. Our aim is for a large proportion of the savings to be found through efficiencies. We will set out more details in due course. The UK clean energy e...
Tabled 30 June 2026 · Department for Transport · UIN 14738
Answered
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, which capital projects have been (i) cancelled, (ii) delayed, (iii) descoped and (iv) reprofiled to fund the Defence Investment Plan by (a) region, (b) original funding allocation and (c) revised funding alloca
View answer · 6 July 2026
Answered by: Simon Lightwood
The Department for Transport is contributing to the reprioritisation of funding to support the Defence Investment Plan. No final decisions have been taken and therefore, no projects have been formally cancelled, delayed, descoped or reprofiled at this sta...
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has conducted an assessment of the potential economic impact from (i) cancellation, (ii) delay, (iii) descoping, (iv) or reprofiling of energy and transport projects to fund increases in defen
View answer · 6 July 2026
Answered by: Lucy Rigby
A safer, more secure country is the right environment for the investment needed to deliver economic growth. This Government’s commitment to the fiscal rules is non-negotiable. To fund the Defence Investment Plan within the fiscal rules, departments have b...
Tabled 30 June 2026 · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government · UIN 14745
Answered
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to support Birmingham City Council in managing the potential financial implications of the cancellation of the Birmingham Highways PFI contrac
View answer · 9 July 2026
Answered by: Alison McGovern
As part of the statutory intervention that commenced in October 2023, Commissioners continue to support Birmingham City Council’s improvement and recovery. My department regularly engages with both the Council and Commissioners, in line with standard prac...
Tabled 30 June 2026 · Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government · UIN 14744
Answered
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what discussions his Department has had with the Birmingham City Council Commissioners on the potential financial impact of the cancellation of the Birmingham Highways PFI contra
View answer · 9 July 2026
Answered by: Alison McGovern
As part of the statutory intervention that commenced in October 2023, Commissioners continue to support Birmingham City Council’s improvement and recovery. My department regularly engages with both the Council and Commissioners, in line with standard prac...
Parliament lists these Early Day Motions as supported by this MP. The member endpoint does not say whether the MP was the primary sponsor or a later signatory, so Project Open Gov does not assign that role.
This profile shows supported Early Day Motions tabled from 13 May 2026 onwards.
This profile shows a concise election summary. The full candidate result and further constituency information are available on the constituency dashboard. Turnout percentage is calculated by Project Open Gov from the official turnout and electorate figures. Constituency and election data last collected 18 August 2026.
Consent on Project Open Gov
We use essential cookies to make this website work.
We would also like to use optional cookies to understand how people use the site and to manage embedded third-party content where it is used.
You can accept optional cookies, reject them, or manage your preferences.
Essential cookies
Always active
These cookies are needed for the website to work properly, including security, basic site functions, caching, forms and cookie preference settings. They are always active.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Analytics cookies
These optional cookies help us understand how people use Project Open Gov, such as which pages are visited and how the site is reached. We use this information to improve the website. Analytics cookies are only used if you agree.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
External media cookies
These optional cookies may be used when third-party embedded content is loaded, such as videos or social media content. Project Open Gov does not use these cookies for advertising or remarketing.
