Votes
Recent vote results
Armed Forces Bill Committee
MPs held 4 related Commons votes during Committee consideration of the Armed Forces Bill. These divisions concerned specific motions or amendments linked to the same Bill or subject.
Party summary for selected division
In Committee on the Armed Forces Bill, MPs considered New Clause 2, which would set a short timetable for publication of the Defence Investment Plan by requiring it to be laid before Parliament within one month after the Act receives Royal Assent. The clause was negatived.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 171 Ayes and 302 Noes.
In Committee on the Armed Forces Bill, MPs considered New Clause 2, which would set a short timetable for publication of the Defence Investment Plan by requiring it to be laid before Parliament within one month after the Act receives Royal Assent. The clause was negatived.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 171 Ayes and 302 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
New Clause 5 would amend the Immigration Act 2014 so that no fees could be charged for applications for indefinite leave to remain under the relevant armed-forces immigration route for spouses and children of serving or previously serving members of the armed forces. MPs voted on a question relating to whether this new clause should be taken forward in Committee.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 170 Ayes and 301 Noes.
New Clause 5 would amend the Immigration Act 2014 so that no fees could be charged for applications for indefinite leave to remain under the relevant armed-forces immigration route for spouses and children of serving or previously serving members of the armed forces. MPs voted on a question relating to whether this new clause should be taken forward in Committee.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 170 Ayes and 301 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The vote was on New Clause 6, titled “Overseas operations and the European Convention on Human Rights”. It would insert a new duty into the Human Rights Act 1998 requiring the Secretary of State, where an overseas operation is or is likely to be significant, to consider whether the UK should make a derogation under Article 15(1) of the ECHR.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 99 Ayes and 371 Noes.
The vote was on New Clause 6, titled “Overseas operations and the European Convention on Human Rights”. It would insert a new duty into the Human Rights Act 1998 requiring the Secretary of State, where an overseas operation is or is likely to be significant, to consider whether the UK should make a derogation under Article 15(1) of the ECHR.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 99 Ayes and 371 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
New Clause 13 would amend the Renters' Rights Act 2025 by inserting “single living accommodation” into the provision setting the standard of MOD accommodation, and would define single living accommodation. The amendment was negatived.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 80 Ayes and 298 Noes.
New Clause 13 would amend the Renters' Rights Act 2025 by inserting “single living accommodation” into the provision setting the standard of MOD accommodation, and would define single living accommodation. The amendment was negatived.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 80 Ayes and 298 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
New Clause 13 would amend the Renters' Rights Act 2025 by inserting “single living accommodation” into the provision setting the standard of MOD accommodation, and would define single living accommodation. The amendment was negatived.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 80 Ayes and 298 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.