Votes
Recent vote results
Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee
MPs held 3 related Commons votes during Committee consideration of the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill. These divisions concerned specific motions or amendments linked to the same Bill or subject.
Party summary for selected division
The division was on “Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: Amendment 20”. The supplied Hansard material discusses Amendment 20 as relating to conditions on the Secretary of State's power to provide financial assistance, including a requirement tied to whether the National Audit Office concludes the assistance would secure value for money. However, the packet does not include the specific text of Amendment 20 or an exact, complete description of what the amendment would insert or change.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 90 Ayes and 290 Noes.
The division was on “Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: Amendment 20”. The supplied Hansard material discusses Amendment 20 as relating to conditions on the Secretary of State's power to provide financial assistance, including a requirement tied to whether the National Audit Office concludes the assistance would secure value for money. However, the packet does not include the specific text of Amendment 20 or an exact, complete description of what the amendment would insert or change.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 90 Ayes and 290 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
New Clause 12 would set an upper limit on the total financial assistance that can be provided under section 58 before 15 August 2029. The clause was debated in the Committee as a way to prevent an open-ended financial commitment and limit Ministers' financial exposure under the Bill.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 94 Ayes and 297 Noes.
New Clause 12 would set an upper limit on the total financial assistance that can be provided under section 58 before 15 August 2029. The clause was debated in the Committee as a way to prevent an open-ended financial commitment and limit Ministers' financial exposure under the Bill.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 94 Ayes and 297 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
In Committee of the whole House, MPs considered New Clause 4, titled “Limit on expenditure on financial assistance and compensation”. It would limit the Secretary of State's total compensation (under Part 2) and financial assistance (under section 58) to £500 million, unless the House of Commons passed a resolution to authorise a higher amount. MPs voted to reject the new clause.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 157 Ayes and 287 Noes.
In Committee of the whole House, MPs considered New Clause 4, titled “Limit on expenditure on financial assistance and compensation”. It would limit the Secretary of State's total compensation (under Part 2) and financial assistance (under section 58) to £500 million, unless the House of Commons passed a resolution to authorise a higher amount. MPs voted to reject the new clause.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 157 Ayes and 287 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
In Committee of the whole House, MPs considered New Clause 4, titled “Limit on expenditure on financial assistance and compensation”. It would limit the Secretary of State's total compensation (under Part 2) and financial assistance (under section 58) to £500 million, unless the House of Commons passed a resolution to authorise a higher amount. MPs voted to reject the new clause.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 157 Ayes and 287 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.