Votes
Recent vote results
Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee
MPs held 3 related Commons votes during Committee consideration of the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill. These divisions concerned specific motions or amendments linked to the same Bill or subject.
Party summary for selected division
Amendment 12 would remove provisions that allow the Government to extend the sunset of the principal transfer powers in the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill. The Hansard debate describes the amendment as keeping those powers strictly time-limited.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 81 Ayes and 266 Noes.
Amendment 12 would remove provisions that allow the Government to extend the sunset of the principal transfer powers in the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill. The Hansard debate describes the amendment as keeping those powers strictly time-limited.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 81 Ayes and 266 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
New Clause 2 would require the Secretary of State to establish a Stakeholder Advisory Committee with representation including steel-reliant industries (such as defence and critical national infrastructure), the steel workforce, and local authorities where the steel undertaking operates. It would also require Ministers to consult the committee and have regard to its advice before deciding that exercising a principal transfer power is necessary in the public interest.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 65 Ayes and 257 Noes.
New Clause 2 would require the Secretary of State to establish a Stakeholder Advisory Committee with representation including steel-reliant industries (such as defence and critical national infrastructure), the steel workforce, and local authorities where the steel undertaking operates. It would also require Ministers to consult the committee and have regard to its advice before deciding that exercising a principal transfer power is necessary in the public interest.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 65 Ayes and 257 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
New Clause 8 would stop the Secretary of State using a “principal transfer power” in relation to a steel undertaking unless they first made a Parliamentary statement covering the contingent liabilities to be acquired and what steps will be taken to minimise taxpayer exposure. MPs voted on adopting this new clause in Committee.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 145 Ayes and 251 Noes.
New Clause 8 would stop the Secretary of State using a “principal transfer power” in relation to a steel undertaking unless they first made a Parliamentary statement covering the contingent liabilities to be acquired and what steps will be taken to minimise taxpayer exposure. MPs voted on adopting this new clause in Committee.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 145 Ayes and 251 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
New Clause 8 would stop the Secretary of State using a “principal transfer power” in relation to a steel undertaking unless they first made a Parliamentary statement covering the contingent liabilities to be acquired and what steps will be taken to minimise taxpayer exposure. MPs voted on adopting this new clause in Committee.
The latest division was recorded as motion negatived with 145 Ayes and 251 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.