Votes
Recent vote results
English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
MPs held eight related Commons votes on Lords amendments to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill.
Party summary for selected division
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that rural affairs were already covered by the Bill’s other areas of competence.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 293 Ayes and 155 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that rural affairs were already covered by the Bill’s other areas of competence.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 293 Ayes and 155 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that the appointment process did not need to be set out in primary legislation.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 298 Ayes and 152 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that the appointment process did not need to be set out in primary legislation.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 298 Ayes and 152 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that such budget changes should not be subject to a simple majority decision by the London Assembly.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 297 Ayes and 147 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that such budget changes should not be subject to a simple majority decision by the London Assembly.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 297 Ayes and 147 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that national planning policy already prioritises brownfield land for development.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 287 Ayes and 149 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that national planning policy already prioritises brownfield land for development.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 287 Ayes and 149 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that Leader and Cabinet Executive arrangements should remain the principal model for local authorities.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 288 Ayes and 147 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that Leader and Cabinet Executive arrangements should remain the principal model for local authorities.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 288 Ayes and 147 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the Lords wording but proposed Amendment 37A in lieu, allowing regulations to include parish council representation in specified neighbourhood structures.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 291 Ayes and 144 Noes.
The Commons rejected the Lords wording but proposed Amendment 37A in lieu, allowing regulations to include parish council representation in specified neighbourhood structures.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 291 Ayes and 144 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that it was not necessary to make provision for the principle in primary legislation.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 284 Ayes and 149 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that it was not necessary to make provision for the principle in primary legislation.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 284 Ayes and 149 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that streamlining the establishment, expansion and functions of combined authorities was needed to put Strategic Authorities in place across England.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 287 Ayes and 150 Noes.
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that streamlining the establishment, expansion and functions of combined authorities was needed to put Strategic Authorities in place across England.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 287 Ayes and 150 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
The Commons rejected the amendment because its stated reason was that rural affairs were already covered by the Bill’s other areas of competence.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 293 Ayes and 155 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.