Votes
Recent vote results
Victims and Courts Bill
MPs held six related Commons votes on Lords amendments to the Victims and Courts Bill.
Party summary for selected division
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was pressure on court and judicial resources.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 291 Ayes and 158 Noes.
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was pressure on court and judicial resources.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 291 Ayes and 158 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was that the proposed obligations would not be workable in practice.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 295 Ayes and 162 Noes.
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was that the proposed obligations would not be workable in practice.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 295 Ayes and 162 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was pressure on court and judicial resources.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 286 Ayes and 163 Noes.
The Commons’ disagreement meant the Lords change was not accepted at that stage. Its stated reason was pressure on court and judicial resources.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 286 Ayes and 163 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
This was part of parliamentary ping-pong on the Bill. The Commons disagreed and set out its reason in the official Commons disagreement paper.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 300 Ayes and 149 Noes.
This was part of parliamentary ping-pong on the Bill. The Commons disagreed and set out its reason in the official Commons disagreement paper.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 300 Ayes and 149 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The amendment would have changed the ordinary timing rules for some referrals. The Commons did not accept it as drafted and proposed amendments in lieu instead.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 292 Ayes and 162 Noes.
The amendment would have changed the ordinary timing rules for some referrals. The Commons did not accept it as drafted and proposed amendments in lieu instead.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 292 Ayes and 162 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The proposal would have added a specific information duty. The Commons disagreed with the Lords change, so that duty was not added to the Bill at that stage.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 290 Ayes and 163 Noes.
The proposal would have added a specific information duty. The Commons disagreed with the Lords change, so that duty was not added to the Bill at that stage.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 290 Ayes and 163 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
The proposal would have added a specific information duty. The Commons disagreed with the Lords change, so that duty was not added to the Bill at that stage.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 290 Ayes and 163 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.