Votes
Recent vote results
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
MPs held five related Commons votes on Lords amendments to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill.
Party summary for selected division
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, meaning it treated the Lords change as affecting financial arrangements that are primarily for the Commons to decide.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 280 Ayes and 161 Noes.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, meaning it treated the Lords change as affecting financial arrangements that are primarily for the Commons to decide.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 280 Ayes and 161 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, so the Lords change was not accepted and the Commons position on the Bill’s financial arrangements was maintained.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 279 Ayes and 167 Noes.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, so the Lords change was not accepted and the Commons position on the Bill’s financial arrangements was maintained.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 279 Ayes and 167 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons treated the amendment as part of the Bill’s financial arrangements and disagreed on financial privilege grounds rather than accepting the Lords change.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 280 Ayes and 164 Noes.
The Commons treated the amendment as part of the Bill’s financial arrangements and disagreed on financial privilege grounds rather than accepting the Lords change.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 280 Ayes and 164 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, maintaining the contribution-limit structure it had previously approved rather than accepting the higher Lords figure.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 281 Ayes and 167 Noes.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, maintaining the contribution-limit structure it had previously approved rather than accepting the higher Lords figure.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 281 Ayes and 167 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, so the proposed exemption was not accepted and the Commons position on the financial measure was maintained.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 278 Ayes and 164 Noes.
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, so the proposed exemption was not accepted and the Commons position on the financial measure was maintained.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 278 Ayes and 164 Noes.
The chart above shows how the recorded Ayes and Noes were split across parties.
What happened
The Commons disagreed on financial privilege grounds, so the proposed exemption was not accepted and the Commons position on the financial measure was maintained.
The latest division was recorded as motion agreed with 278 Ayes and 164 Noes.
Grouped results summary
Divisions in this vote group
Each row below shows the result and Aye/No counts for that individual division.
Sources
Official records used for the vote result and explanation.