Votes and decisions

How Lords amendment votes work

When the House of Lords changes a Bill, the House of Commons must consider those changes before the Bill can normally proceed to final agreement. MPs may be asked to accept a Lords amendment, reject it, alter it or propose different wording instead.

Scope of this guide: This page is about Commons decisions on amendments made by the House of Lords. It does not repeat every stage of a Bill. For votes at Second Reading, Committee, Report Stage and Third Reading, see How bill stage votes work.

Short answer

If the Lords changes a Bill, the Commons considers the changes made by the Lords. A Commons division at this point usually concerns a particular amendment or group of amendments, rather than reopening the whole Bill from the beginning.

A specific change The question often concerns particular wording inserted, removed or altered by the Lords.
A Commons response MPs may agree, disagree, modify the Lords proposal or put forward alternative wording.
Final text must match Under the ordinary process, both Houses must agree the same text before the Bill can receive Royal Assent.

Where Lords amendments fit

This is only the part of the Bill process needed to understand these votes. The detailed stages before this point are covered in the Bill-stage guide.

1

First House completes its stages

The Bill passes through the main stages in the House where it began.

2

Second House considers the Bill

The other House considers the Bill and may change its wording through amendments.

3

Lords changes return to the Commons

For a Bill that began in the Commons, amendments made by the Lords are sent back for MPs to consider.

4

Commons decides its response

MPs can accept a Lords change, reject it or propose a different version.

5

Further exchanges if needed

If the Houses still disagree, the Bill can return between them with revised proposals.

6

Same text agreed

Once both Houses agree the final wording, the Bill can normally proceed to Royal Assent.

Commons response

What MPs may be voting on

The motion tells you what the Commons is being asked to do with the Lords proposal. Similar-looking votes can therefore have opposite effects depending on whether the motion says “agree”, “disagree” or proposes alternative wording.

Agree Accept the Lords amendment so that its wording becomes part of the Bill.
Disagree Reject the Lords amendment and maintain a different Commons position.
Offer another version Change the Lords amendment or propose alternative wording instead.

Wording you may see in a vote title

Commons papers use formal wording because the House is deciding the precise response to another House. These phrases are useful indicators of what the vote would do.

Wording What it means in practice
Agree with the Lords in their Amendment The Commons is being asked to accept the change made by the Lords.
Disagree with the Lords in their Amendment The Commons is being asked to reject that Lords change.
Amend the Lords Amendment The Commons is considering altered wording rather than accepting the Lords amendment exactly as sent.
Amendment in lieu The Commons proposes alternative wording in place of a Lords amendment it does not accept.
Insist on / do not insist on The House is deciding whether to maintain or withdraw a position it took in an earlier round.
Lords Amendment 1B, 1C and similar labels The suffix can identify a later proposal in the exchanges between the Houses. The current motion and amendment paper show exactly what wording is under consideration.

What does a Lords amendment vote mean?

The result settles the particular Commons motion put on that amendment or related proposal. Its formal scope may be narrow, although the change itself can have substantial legal or political consequences for the Bill.

The motion is the key

An Aye supports the motion as worded. If the motion is to agree with the Lords, an Aye supports accepting the Lords change. If the motion is to disagree, an Aye supports rejecting that change.

The amendment provides the substance

The amendment paper, Bill page and debate show what the proposed wording would change. That context is needed to understand the practical significance of the Aye/No result.

Consideration of amendments

What is parliamentary “ping-pong”?

“Ping-pong” is the informal name for the period when the Commons and Lords consider each other’s amendments and alternative proposals. If one House does not accept the other’s position, the Bill can be sent back with another proposal for consideration.

A further vote may therefore concern the same policy issue but different wording from an earlier division. The latest motion and amendment paper are the best guide to what is now being decided.

One issue can return The Houses may consider revised wording on the same disputed provision more than once.
Positions can change A House may maintain its earlier position, accept the other House’s proposal or agree a compromise.
Agreement ends the exchange Once both Houses agree the same final text, the Bill can move on to Royal Assent.

What if the two Houses do not reach agreement?

The normal route requires the Commons and Lords to agree the same final text. If they cannot do so, a Bill can fall. The Parliament Acts provide a limited exception for certain public Bills that start in the House of Commons.

For most qualifying Commons public Bills

The Lords can delay rather than permanently veto the Bill. If the statutory conditions are met, the Commons can pass the Bill again in a later session and it can ultimately be presented for Royal Assent without the Lords agreeing to it.

It is not a general override

The Parliament Acts apply only in defined circumstances. Money Bills have a separate one-month rule, and some Bills are outside the Acts altogether. They also do not apply to delegated legislation such as statutory instruments.

The Parliament Acts are an exceptional route with detailed statutory conditions. The future How laws are made guide will cover those rules in more depth.

What the result does not establish on its own

It is not usually a fresh vote on the entire Bill. The division normally concerns a particular Lords amendment or the Commons response to it.
An Aye does not have one fixed meaning across all Lords amendment votes. It supports the motion before the House, so the wording determines whether that means accepting, rejecting or changing the Lords proposal.
Rejecting one Lords amendment does not necessarily end the Bill. The Commons can propose another position, which may then return to the Lords.
A narrowly worded amendment can still be significant. The scope of the vote and the importance of its legal or policy effect are separate questions.

Worked example from Project Open Gov

A real Commons vote on a Lords amendment

The vote was on a Commons motion to agree Lords Amendment 1. Hansard records that the amendment was intended to clarify the Bill would not criminalise genuine humanitarian activity by NGOs or journalists and would strengthen the framework for prosecuting those acting for foreign intelligence services and their proxies.

Lords amendment vote Motion agreed

National Security (State Threats) Bill

Agreeing Lords Amendment 1 · 6 July 2026 at 19:19
Ayes394
Noes85
Majority309
Votes cast479

The figures show the numerical result. The motion label explains the Commons response that those Ayes and Noes decided.

How Project Open Gov presents Lords amendment votes

Project Open Gov uses a Lords amendment vote label where the official title or motion shows that the Commons is responding to a change made by the Lords. The individual division wording is then used to explain whether MPs were being asked to agree, disagree or consider an alternative proposal.

Where a related Bill can be identified, the vote is also linked back to the Bill so the amendment can be understood within the wider legislation without repeating the Bill’s full history on the vote page.

Vote-type label Identifies the division as part of Commons consideration of Lords changes.
Motion context Shows the particular amendment and whether the Commons is agreeing, disagreeing or proposing another position.
Related Bill Connects the division with the legislation to which the amendment belongs where the data supports the link.
Last reviewed: 22 August 2026

Scroll to Top